{"id":8484,"date":"2020-10-23T12:36:02","date_gmt":"2020-10-23T11:36:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uk.inbody.com\/?page_id=8484"},"modified":"2020-10-23T12:52:31","modified_gmt":"2020-10-23T11:52:31","slug":"inbody-in-studies","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/ro.inbody.com\/ro\/inbody-in-studies\/","title":{"rendered":"InBody in Studies"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t

Validation Studies of InBody Accuracy<\/strong><\/h2>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n
\n
\n

Study 1<\/strong><\/h3>\n
HIGH CORRELATION WITH DEXA FOR LEAN MASS MEASUREMENTS<\/strong><\/h5>\n

A 2011 study published by Clinical Nutrition compared the accuracy of DSM-BIA (InBody 720) against DXA with 484 middle-aged participants. The study found that the InBody had a 99% correlation to DXA when measuring lean mass in normal and overweight populations<\/strong>. \u201cIn conclusion, this study shows DSM-BIA<\/strong> to be a valid tool for the assessment of whole body composition and segmental lean mass measurements <\/strong>in middle-aged population when validated against DEXA<\/strong>\u201c<\/p>\n

Ling, Carolina H. Y.; de Craen, Anton J. M.; Slagboom, Pieternella E.; Gunn, Dave A.; Stokkel, Marcel P. M.; Westendorp, Rudi G. J.; Maier, Andrea B. (2011-10).\u00a0\u201cAccuracy of direct segmental multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis in the assessment of total body and segmental body composition in middle-aged adult population\u201d<\/a>.\u00a0Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)<\/em>.\u00a030<\/strong>\u00a0(5): 610\u2013615.\u00a0doi<\/a>:10.1016\/j.clnu.2011.04.001<\/a>.\u00a0ISSN<\/a>\u00a01532-1983<\/a>.\u00a0PMID<\/a>\u00a021555168<\/a>.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Study 2<\/strong><\/h3>\n
ACCURATE BODY WATER MEASUREMENTS REGARDLESS OF BODY SIZE<\/strong><\/h5>\n

A\u00a02005 cross-validation study published by the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition evaluated the accuracy of eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment total body water (TBW) and extracellular water (ECW) in severe obesity. The InBody 3.0\u2019s results were compared to results found from the Br dilution method. The study concluded that the InBody offered accurate<\/strong> estimates<\/strong> of TBW and ECW without the need for population-specific formulas<\/strong> or empirical equations.<\/p>\n

Sartorio, A.; Malavolti, M.; Agosti, F.; Marinone, P. G.; Caiti, O.; Battistini, N.; Bedogni, G. (February 2005).\u00a0\u201cBody water distribution in severe obesity and its assessment from eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis\u201d<\/a>.\u00a0European Journal of Clinical Nutrition<\/em>.\u00a059<\/strong>(2): 155\u2013160.\u00a0doi<\/a>:10.1038\/sj.ejcn.1602049<\/a>.\u00a0ISSN<\/a>\u00a00954-3007<\/a>.\u00a0PMID<\/a>\u00a015340370<\/a>.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Study 3<\/strong><\/h3>\n
HIGH ACCURACY OF BODY FAT MEASURES IN HEALTHY POPULATIONS<\/strong><\/h5>\n

A\u00a02004 study published by the Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science compared the accuracy of three BIA devices (Tanita BC-118 [SF-BIA4], Tanita TBF-101 [SF-BIA8], InBody 3.0 [MF-BIA8]) against DXA and hydrostatic weighing. The study concluded that the InBody 3.0<\/strong> (referred to as MF-BIA8) showed the highest correlation in results to DXA and hydrostatic weighing<\/strong> and showed the least estimation error<\/strong> compared to the other BIA methods (94% correlation with DXA and 81% correlation with hydrostatic weighing).<\/p>\n

Demura, Shinichi; Sato, Susumu; Kitabayashi, Tamotsu (2004).\u00a0\u201cPercentage of Total Body Fat as Estimated by Three Automatic Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzers\u201d<\/a>.\u00a0Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY and Applied Human Science.\u00a023\u00a0(3): 93\u201399.\u00a0doi<\/a>:10.2114\/jpa.23.93<\/a>.\u00a0ISSN<\/a>\u00a01345-3475<\/a>.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Study 4<\/strong><\/h3>\n
HIGH ACCURACY AND EASE OF USE AS A FIELD-BASED ASSESSMENT TOOL<\/strong><\/h5>\n

A study published in 2010 found results from the InBody 520 to be highly correlated with fat-free mass (FFM) measures from hydrostatic weighing (96%)<\/strong>.\u00a0 The study also concluded that the InBody does not require a high degree of technical skill, making it easy to use and safe, and also provides simultaneous measures of body mass, body composition, and TBW in a short period of time.<\/strong> \u201cThese advantages may make MFBIA attractive to educational institutions that may not have access to trained anthropometrists, HW, ADP, and DXA and to address concerns that have been expressed by coaches, officials, and athletic trainers who question the results of SK testing performed by someone who may not be completely objective or impartial.\u201d<\/p>\n

UTTER, ALAN C.; LAMBETH, PAMELA G. (2010-02).\u00a0\u201cEvaluation of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Assessing Body Composition of Wrestlers\u201d<\/a>.\u00a0Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise<\/em>.\u00a042<\/strong>(2): 361\u2013367.\u00a0doi<\/a>:10.1249\/mss.0b013e3181b2e8b4<\/a>.\u00a0ISSN<\/a>\u00a00195-9131<\/a>.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Study 5<\/strong><\/h3>\n
HIGH ACCURACY OF BOTH TOTAL AND SEGMENTAL LEAN BODY MASS IN YOUNG CHILDREN<\/strong><\/h5>\n

A\u00a02009 cross-validation study published by the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition compared the accuracy of tetra (RJL Systems model 101A) and octopolar (InBody 3.0) bioelectrical impedance analysis against DXA for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition in children. The study concluded that the InBody 3.0<\/strong>\u00a0was superior to BIA devices that use only 4 electrodes<\/strong> for the prediction of FFM, that empirical estimations tetrapolar BIA devices used gave biased predictions of FFM, and that InBody was an accurate predictor of segmental\u00a0<\/strong>body composition.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kriemler, S.; Puder, J.; Zahner, L.; Roth, R.; Braun-Fahrl\u00e4nder, C.; Bedogni, G. (2009-5).\u00a0\u201cCross-validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children\u201d<\/a>.\u00a0European Journal of Clinical Nutrition<\/em>.\u00a063<\/strong>\u00a0(5): 619\u2013626.\u00a0doi<\/a>:10.1038\/ejcn.2008.19<\/a>.\u00a0ISSN<\/a>\u00a01476-5640<\/a>.\u00a0PMID<\/a>\u00a018285806<\/a>.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\n
\n\t
\n\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Study 6<\/strong><\/h3>\n
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR VALID FOR CLINICAL USE<\/strong><\/h5>\n

\u201cThe single-cuff oscillometric device InBody BPBIO320\u00a0developed for self-measurement by\u00a0adults<\/strong>\u00a0in public\u00a0spaces passed all the validation requirements of the 2010\u00a0ESH-IP and can be recommended for clinical use.\u201d The test\u2013reference BP difference\u00a0was 0.5\u00b14.3\/\u22121.1\u00b14.3mmHg (systolic\/diastolic) in participants\u00a0with arm circumference less than 31.4 cm (n=17) and\u00a0\u22121.3\u00b16.0\/0.2\u00b14.8mmHg in those with an arm circumference\u00a0of at least 31.4 cm (n=16).\u00a0This indicates that the margin of error is ~5\/5.5 mmHg (systolic\/diastolic) in those with smaller arms, and ~7\/5 mmHg (systolic\/diastolic) in those with higher arm circumference.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kollias, A., Stambolliu, E., Kyriakoulis, K. G., Papadatos, S. S., & Stergiou, G. S. (2019). Validation of the single-cuff oscillometric blood pressure monitor InBody BPBIO320 for public use according to the 2010 European Society of Hypertension International Protocol<\/a>.\u00a0Blood pressure monitoring<\/em>,\u00a024<\/em>(1), 30-32.<\/h6>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n
\n
\n
\n \"\"\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Validation Studies of InBody Accuracy Study 1 HIGH CORRELATION WITH DEXA FOR LEAN MASS MEASUREMENTS A 2011 study published by Clinical Nutrition compared the accuracy of DSM-BIA (InBody 720) against...","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-8484","page","type-page","status-publish"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ro.inbody.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ro.inbody.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ro.inbody.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ro.inbody.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ro.inbody.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8484"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/ro.inbody.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8484\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10647,"href":"https:\/\/ro.inbody.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/8484\/revisions\/10647"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ro.inbody.com\/ro\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}